Uno Reverse vs Bordrless

Uno Reverse (UNO) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, UNO is ahead by 40.0 percentage points (UNO -58.8% against BORDR -98.7%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.12 across 22 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 959% annualised against UNO's 161%.

Correlation: -0.12
Ahead over 30 days: UNO

Uno ReverseUNO

$1.019e-5

24h: -9.34%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $152
Volatility (ann.): 161%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 959%

UNO 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

UNOBORDR

7 days-16.56%-16.86%UNO
30 days-58.79%-98.75%UNO

Correlation

-0.12over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	UNO	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-58.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.37	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: UNO outperformed BORDR by 1851.0% — measured on the UNO/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Uno Reverse →Bordrless →