UselessCat vs Bordrless

UselessCat (UCAT) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, UCAT is ahead by 24.0 percentage points (UCAT -75.5% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.11 across 20 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against UCAT's 418%.

Correlation: -0.11
Ahead over 30 days: UCAT

UselessCatUCAT

$2.512e-6

24h: -0.24%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $11
Volatility (ann.): 418%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

UCAT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

UCATBORDR

7 days-28.29%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-75.45%-99.45%UCAT

Correlation

-0.11over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	UCAT	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-78.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.18	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: UCAT outperformed BORDR by 917.7% — measured on the UCAT/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

UselessCat →Bordrless →