BTC$80,752.01▲ 5.09%ETH$2,432.12▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.65▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.31▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,314.30▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.39▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.49▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1977▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1687▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.06▲ 7.53%UNI$7.68▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.31▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.77▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9312▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,110.40▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0729▲ 6.49%QNT$203.25▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,752.01▲ 5.09%ETH$2,432.12▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.65▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.31▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,314.30▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.39▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.49▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1977▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1687▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.06▲ 7.53%UNI$7.68▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.31▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.77▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9312▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,110.40▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0729▲ 6.49%QNT$203.25▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Veterans for the Cause vs catwifhat

catwifhat ($CWIF) is 39.2× the size of Veterans for the Cause (VETS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.43 across 39 shared trading days). $CWIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 131% annualised against VETS's 75%.

Correlation
0.43
Size ratio
1 : 39.2
Veterans for the CauseVETS

$0.004152

24h
+4.55%
Market cap
$415,248
Volume 24h
$6
Volatility (ann.)
75%
catwifhat$CWIF

$1.628e-8

24h
+3.21%
Market cap
$16.28M
Volume 24h
$307
Volatility (ann.)
131%
VETS 2.5%Share of the two combined market caps97.5% $CWIF

Performance

VETS$CWIF

  1. 7 days-23.01%-33.42%VETS
  2. 30 days-13.14%-42.77%VETS
  3. 90 days+15.41%——

Correlation

0.43over 39 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricVETS$CWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-37.5%-49.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.19-0.33

Relative strength over 90 days: VETS outperformed $CWIF by 62.7% — measured on the VETS/$CWIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.