BTC$80,714.26▲ 5.09%ETH$2,429.94▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.74▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.20▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3197▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,309.60▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.19▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.50▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1979▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1688▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.04▲ 7.53%UNI$7.66▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.24▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.78▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9293▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,105.57▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.49%QNT$203.70▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,714.26▲ 5.09%ETH$2,429.94▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.74▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.20▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3197▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,309.60▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.19▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.50▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1979▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1688▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.04▲ 7.53%UNI$7.66▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.24▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.78▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9293▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,105.57▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.49%QNT$203.70▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Veterans for the Cause vs WYDE: End Hunger

WYDE: End Hunger (EAT) is 35.5× the size of Veterans for the Cause (VETS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.56 across 35 shared trading days). EAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 92% annualised against VETS's 75%.

Correlation
0.56
Size ratio
1 : 35.5
Veterans for the CauseVETS

$0.004152

24h
+4.55%
Market cap
$415,248
Volume 24h
$6
Volatility (ann.)
75%
WYDE: End HungerEAT

$0.000147

24h
+3.81%
Market cap
$14.72M
Volume 24h
$6,654
Volatility (ann.)
92%
VETS 2.7%Share of the two combined market caps97.3% EAT

Performance

VETSEAT

  1. 7 days-23.01%-16.29%EAT
  2. 30 days-13.14%-34.70%VETS
  3. 90 days+15.41%——

Correlation

0.56over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricVETSEAT
Max drawdown (400d)-37.5%-44.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.19-0.43

Relative strength over 90 days: VETS outperformed EAT by 45.4% — measured on the VETS/EAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.