BTC$75,914.54▼ 5.45%ETH$2,232.76▼ 7.76%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$688.72▼ 4.06%XRP$1.22▼ 6.27%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.95▼ 5.09%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.57%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.52%ZEC$1,250.74▼ 2.81%HYPE$77.14▼ 6.52%XMR$118.70▼ 3.62%DOGE$0.0719▼ 6.23%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$72.92▼ 6.07%LEO$9.32▼ 0.24%LINK$10.71▼ 6.19%ADA$0.1819▼ 7.48%BCH$271.40▼ 3.03%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.36%NEAR$3.70▼ 7.89%USDE$1.00▼ 0.09%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%RAIN$0.005928▼ 0.46%UNI$6.82▼ 10.54%LTC$52.02▼ 7.22%CC$0.0967▼ 1.48%AVAX$8.27▼ 5.30%USD1$0.9997▼ 0.03%SUI$0.8481▼ 7.92%XAUT$4,070.74▲ 0.69%GRAM$1.12▼ 5.69%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.00%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%QNT$188.78▼ 6.45%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.15%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$217.50▼ 7.00%CRO$0.0489▼ 5.16%BTC$75,914.54▼ 5.45%ETH$2,232.76▼ 7.76%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$688.72▼ 4.06%XRP$1.22▼ 6.27%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.95▼ 5.09%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.57%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.52%ZEC$1,250.74▼ 2.81%HYPE$77.14▼ 6.52%XMR$118.70▼ 3.62%DOGE$0.0719▼ 6.23%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$72.92▼ 6.07%LEO$9.32▼ 0.24%LINK$10.71▼ 6.19%ADA$0.1819▼ 7.48%BCH$271.40▼ 3.03%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.36%NEAR$3.70▼ 7.89%USDE$1.00▼ 0.09%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%RAIN$0.005928▼ 0.46%UNI$6.82▼ 10.54%LTC$52.02▼ 7.22%CC$0.0967▼ 1.48%AVAX$8.27▼ 5.30%USD1$0.9997▼ 0.03%SUI$0.8481▼ 7.92%XAUT$4,070.74▲ 0.69%GRAM$1.12▼ 5.69%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.00%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%QNT$188.78▼ 6.45%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.15%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$217.50▼ 7.00%CRO$0.0489▼ 5.16%

VISION ai by Virtuals vs Ethereum Name Service

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is 11504.7× the size of VISION ai by Virtuals (VISION) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.46 across 182 shared trading days). VISION has been the more volatile of the two, at 99% annualised against ENS's 82%.

Correlation
0.46
Size ratio
1 : 11504.7
VISION ai by VirtualsVISION

$1.713e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$17,089
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
99%
Ethereum Name ServiceENS

$4.6300

24h
-8.21%
Market cap
$196.60M
Volume 24h
$12.41M
Volatility (ann.)
82%
VISION 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% ENS

Performance

VISIONENS

  1. 7 days+4.14%-3.96%VISION
  2. 30 days+2.11%-25.80%VISION
  3. 90 days-3.32%+21.19%ENS
  4. 1 year—-59.35%—

Correlation

0.46over 182 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4590d: 0.531y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricVISIONENS
Max drawdown (400d)-59.5%-82.4%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.030.23
Best 30 days (past year)—+48.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-51.6%

Relative strength over 90 days: ENS outperformed VISION by 26.6% — measured on the VISION/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.