wager.fun vs Bordrless

wager.fun (W) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, W is ahead by 67.4 percentage points (W -32.0% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.58 across 21 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against W's 67%.

Correlation: 0.58
Ahead over 30 days: W

wager.funW

$2.180e-6

24h: -1.62%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $0
Volatility (ann.): 67%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

W 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

WBORDR

7 days-26.91%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-32.04%-99.45%W

Correlation

0.58over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	W	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-32.7%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.48	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: W outperformed BORDR by 2139.1% — measured on the W/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

wager.fun →Bordrless →