White Lotus vs BNB

White Lotus (LOTUS) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.67 across 26 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 52% annualised.

Correlation: 0.67

White LotusLOTUS

$0.570023

24h: +0.54%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $5
Volatility (ann.): 54%

BNBBNB

$713.8900

24h: +2.54%
Market cap: $93.87B
Volume 24h: $1.13B
Volatility (ann.): 51%

LOTUS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

LOTUSBNB

7 days-4.39%-6.28%LOTUS
30 days-16.67%-12.23%BNB
90 days—+17.56%—
1 year—-29.73%—

Correlation

0.67over 26 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LOTUS	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-16.8%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.31	0.45
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed LOTUS by 6.1% — measured on the LOTUS/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

White Lotus →BNB →