wild white buffalo vs Bordrless

wild white buffalo (WWB) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, WWB is ahead by 82.4 percentage points (WWB -17.1% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.32 across 20 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against WWB's 198%.

Correlation: 0.32
Ahead over 30 days: WWB

wild white buffalo WWB

$4.876e-6

24h: -0.19%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $11
Volatility (ann.): 198%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

WWB 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

WWBBORDR

7 days-9.38%-10.80%WWB
30 days-17.08%-99.45%WWB

Correlation

0.32over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	WWB	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-44.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.09	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: WWB outperformed BORDR by 1459.1% — measured on the WWB/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

wild white buffalo →Bordrless →