wintermolt vs ARGUE.FUN

ARGUE.FUN ($ARGUE) is 6.5× the size of wintermolt (WINTERMOLT) by market capitalisation. Over the past 90 days, $ARGUE is ahead by 108.4 percentage points (WINTERMOLT -78.3% against $ARGUE +30.0%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.42 across 65 shared trading days). WINTERMOLT has been the more volatile of the two, at 168% annualised against $ARGUE's 112%.

Correlation: 0.42
Size ratio: 1 : 6.5
Ahead over 90 days: $ARGUE

wintermoltWINTERMOLT

$5.440e-7

24h: —
Market cap: $46,724
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 168%

ARGUE.FUN$ARGUE

$3.980e-6

24h: —
Market cap: $302,547
Volume 24h: $166
Volatility (ann.): 112%

WINTERMOLT 13.4%Share of the two combined market caps86.6% $ARGUE

Performance

WINTERMOLT$ARGUE

7 days+23.28%-14.97%WINTERMOLT
30 days-7.95%-8.32%WINTERMOLT
90 days-78.34%+30.02%$ARGUE

Correlation

0.42over 65 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.8490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	WINTERMOLT	$ARGUE
Max drawdown (400d)	-84.2%	-84.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.47	0.41

Relative strength over 90 days: WINTERMOLT outperformed $ARGUE by 66.0% — measured on the WINTERMOLT/$ARGUE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

wintermolt →ARGUE.FUN →