Wrapped ILCOIN vs Bitget Wrapped BTC

Wrapped ILCOIN (WILC) and Bitget Wrapped BTC (BGBTC) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, BGBTC is ahead by 29.6 percentage points (WILC -28.8% against BGBTC +0.8%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.10 across 21 shared trading days). WILC has been the more volatile of the two, at 64% annualised against BGBTC's 48%.

Correlation: -0.10
Ahead over 30 days: BGBTC

Wrapped ILCOINWILC

$0.000835

24h: -10.39%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $6,542
Volatility (ann.): 64%

Bitget Wrapped BTCBGBTC

$80,201

24h: +3.04%
Market cap: $111.00M
Volume 24h: $59,917
Volatility (ann.): 48%

WILC 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BGBTC

Performance

WILCBGBTC

7 days-15.36%-3.64%BGBTC
30 days-28.83%+0.77%BGBTC

Correlation

-0.10over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	WILC	BGBTC
Max drawdown (400d)	-33.1%	-9.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.46	0.42

Relative strength over 90 days: BGBTC outperformed WILC by 10.3% — measured on the WILC/BGBTC ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Wrapped ILCOIN →Bitget Wrapped BTC →