BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

X Bangers vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 15020.8× the size of X Bangers (BANGERS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.11 across 34 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against BANGERS's 82%.

Correlation
0.11
Size ratio
1 : 15020.8
X BangersBANGERS

$1.108e-5

24h
-0.63%
Market cap
$10,879
Volume 24h
$152
Volatility (ann.)
82%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163700

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BANGERS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BANGERSWIF

  1. 7 days-8.62%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-14.91%-32.13%BANGERS
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.11over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBANGERSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-21.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.190.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BANGERS outperformed WIF by 23.9% — measured on the BANGERS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.