BTC$77,492.70▼ 4.70%ETH$2,305.60▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$697.53▼ 3.70%XRP$1.27▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.85▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,252.35▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.48▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0732▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.99▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1871▼ 7.29%BCH$283.90▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1583▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.83▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9999▼ 0.01%UNI$7.08▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.36▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.43▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8742▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,099.73▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.12▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0690▼ 7.28%QNT$195.83▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$222.60▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%BTC$77,492.70▼ 4.70%ETH$2,305.60▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$697.53▼ 3.70%XRP$1.27▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.85▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,252.35▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.48▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0732▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.99▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1871▼ 7.29%BCH$283.90▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1583▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.83▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9999▼ 0.01%UNI$7.08▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.36▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.43▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8742▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,099.73▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.12▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0690▼ 7.28%QNT$195.83▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$222.60▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%

You can’t afford this coin vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 31458.1× the size of You can’t afford this coin (EXPENSIVE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.21 across 32 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against EXPENSIVE's 76%.

Correlation
0.21
Size ratio
1 : 31458.1
You can’t afford this coinEXPENSIVE

$5.310e-6

24h
+5.68%
Market cap
$5,229
Volume 24h
$239
Volatility (ann.)
76%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.165900

24h
-9.29%
Market cap
$164.49M
Volume 24h
$28.27M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
EXPENSIVE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

EXPENSIVEWIF

  1. 7 days-7.99%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-21.40%-32.13%EXPENSIVE
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.21over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricEXPENSIVEWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-25.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.320.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: EXPENSIVE outperformed WIF by 11.0% — measured on the EXPENSIVE/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.