BTC$80,538.01▲ 3.38%ETH$2,430.78▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.00▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.31▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,301.72▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.65▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.50▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.05▲ 4.63%UNI$7.72▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.36▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9305▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,049.01▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0727▲ 3.96%QNT$203.62▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.70▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,538.01▲ 3.38%ETH$2,430.78▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.00▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.31▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,301.72▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.65▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.50▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.05▲ 4.63%UNI$7.72▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.36▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9305▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,049.01▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0727▲ 3.96%QNT$203.62▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.70▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Zelwin vs LUCA

Zelwin (ZLW) and LUCA (LUCA) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.17 across 31 shared trading days). ZLW has been the more volatile of the two, at 99% annualised against LUCA's 50%.

Correlation
0.17
ZelwinZLW

$9.630e-5

24h
+2.82%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$1,424
Volatility (ann.)
99%
LUCALUCA

$0.276061

24h
-6.34%
Market cap
$14.00M
Volume 24h
$134,212
Volatility (ann.)
50%
ZLW 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% LUCA

Performance

ZLWLUCA

  1. 7 days+0.07%-12.76%ZLW
  2. 30 days-59.91%-14.85%LUCA
  3. 90 days-76.41%——
  4. 1 year-82.92%——

Correlation

0.17over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricZLWLUCA
Max drawdown (400d)-84.7%-24.3%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.44-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: LUCA outperformed ZLW by 66.0% — measured on the ZLW/LUCA ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.