BTC$76,999.25▼ 1.36%ETH$2,283.79▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$692.91▼ 1.07%XRP$1.26▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$90.87▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,231.36▼ 4.13%HYPE$78.82▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0728▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.89▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1861▼ 2.87%BCH$281.20▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1570▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.77▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$6.98▼ 5.21%LTC$53.07▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.37▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8648▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,099.47▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0685▼ 4.25%QNT$194.06▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.50▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%BTC$76,999.25▼ 1.36%ETH$2,283.79▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$692.91▼ 1.07%XRP$1.26▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$90.87▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,231.36▼ 4.13%HYPE$78.82▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0728▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.89▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1861▼ 2.87%BCH$281.20▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1570▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.77▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$6.98▼ 5.21%LTC$53.07▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.37▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8648▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,099.47▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0685▼ 4.25%QNT$194.06▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.50▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%

ZENDAWG vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 1069.7× the size of ZENDAWG (ZEN) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.11 across 35 shared trading days). ZEN has been the more volatile of the two, at 182% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.11
Size ratio
1 : 1069.7
ZENDAWGZEN

$0.000225

24h
+3.02%
Market cap
$156,599
Volume 24h
$737
Volatility (ann.)
182%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164500

24h
-4.99%
Market cap
$167.51M
Volume 24h
$28.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
ZEN 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% WIF

Performance

ZENWIF

  1. 7 days+13.92%-7.39%ZEN
  2. 30 days-25.87%-32.13%ZEN
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.11over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricZENWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-55.7%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.180.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed ZEN by 2.5% — measured on the ZEN/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.