BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%

zkDoge vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 8035.7× the size of zkDoge (ZKDOGE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.58 across 180 shared trading days). ZKDOGE has been the more volatile of the two, at 134% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.58
Size ratio
1 : 8035.7
zkDogeZKDOGE

$2.000e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$19,993
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
134%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.161100

24h
-6.07%
Market cap
$160.66M
Volume 24h
$30.99M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
ZKDOGE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

ZKDOGEWIF

  1. 7 days-17.93%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days+12.11%-32.13%ZKDOGE
  3. 90 days-16.59%+21.70%WIF
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.58over 180 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6590d: 0.621y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricZKDOGEWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-76.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.150.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: ZKDOGE outperformed WIF by 5.2% — measured on the ZKDOGE/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.