BTC$77,197.01▼ 4.70%ETH$2,290.34▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$694.76▼ 3.70%XRP$1.26▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.00▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,241.98▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.10▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0728▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.91▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1861▼ 7.29%BCH$281.60▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1573▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.78▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.02▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.11▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.39▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8671▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,093.49▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0688▼ 7.28%QNT$195.25▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$221.40▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%BTC$77,197.01▼ 4.70%ETH$2,290.34▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$694.76▼ 3.70%XRP$1.26▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.00▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,241.98▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.10▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0728▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.91▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1861▼ 7.29%BCH$281.60▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1573▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.78▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.02▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.11▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.39▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8671▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,093.49▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0688▼ 7.28%QNT$195.25▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$221.40▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%

Zoomer vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 2890.7× the size of Zoomer (ZOOMER) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.45 across 21 shared trading days). ZOOMER has been the more volatile of the two, at 465% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.45
Size ratio
1 : 2890.7
ZoomerZOOMER

$5.721e-5

24h
+6.98%
Market cap
$56,904
Volume 24h
$134
Volatility (ann.)
465%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.165300

24h
-9.29%
Market cap
$164.49M
Volume 24h
$28.27M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
ZOOMER 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

ZOOMERWIF

  1. 7 days-97.55%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days—-32.13%—
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.45over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricZOOMERWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-98.3%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.210.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed ZOOMER by 97.5% — measured on the ZOOMER/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.