BTC$79,762.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,388.56▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.99▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,314.69▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.79▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.44▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1944▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.10▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.96▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.14▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.69▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9120▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,111.82▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.29▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$232.20▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%BTC$79,762.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,388.56▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.99▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,314.69▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.79▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.44▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1944▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.10▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.96▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.14▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.69▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9120▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,111.82▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.29▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$232.20▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%

Albemarle City vs Bonk

Bonk (BONK) is 1777.2× the size of Albemarle City (ALBEMARLE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.07 across 35 shared trading days). ALBEMARLE has been the more volatile of the two, at 283% annualised against BONK's 100%.

Correlation
0.07
Size ratio
1 : 1777.2
Albemarle CityALBEMARLE

$0.000148

24h
+9.80%
Market cap
$147,759
Volume 24h
$1,069
Volatility (ann.)
283%
BonkBONK

$3.000e-6

24h
-1.63%
Market cap
$262.59M
Volume 24h
$26.66M
Volatility (ann.)
100%
ALBEMARLE 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% BONK

Performance

ALBEMARLEBONK

  1. 7 days-3.14%-3.80%ALBEMARLE
  2. 30 days+42.44%-21.04%ALBEMARLE
  3. 90 days—+8.96%—
  4. 1 year—-73.52%—

Correlation

0.07over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricALBEMARLEBONK
Max drawdown (400d)-49.7%-89.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.100.09
Best 30 days (past year)—+37.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-51.0%

Relative strength over 90 days: ALBEMARLE outperformed BONK by 58.7% — measured on the ALBEMARLE/BONK ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.