BTC$80,405.22▲ 4.43%ETH$2,415.89▲ 6.60%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$716.71▲ 3.08%XRP$1.30▲ 3.82%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.63▲ 3.99%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.86%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,293.74▲ 7.36%HYPE$84.09▲ 0.98%DOGE$0.0768▲ 3.55%XMR$118.70▲ 1.61%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.73▲ 5.09%LINK$11.38▲ 4.80%LEO$9.34▲ 0.37%ADA$0.1960▲ 4.81%XLM$0.1669▲ 4.37%BCH$280.30▲ 3.17%NEAR$4.01▲ 5.71%UNI$7.63▲ 7.27%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.09▲ 4.99%RAIN$0.005956▼ 8.35%CC$0.0994▲ 2.92%AVAX$8.67▲ 3.50%SUI$0.9261▲ 5.10%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.61%XAUT$4,084.47▲ 3.51%HBAR$0.0722▲ 5.13%QNT$201.95▲ 6.25%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.31%TAO$235.00▲ 5.45%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0520▲ 4.50%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,405.22▲ 4.43%ETH$2,415.89▲ 6.60%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$716.71▲ 3.08%XRP$1.30▲ 3.82%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.63▲ 3.99%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.86%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,293.74▲ 7.36%HYPE$84.09▲ 0.98%DOGE$0.0768▲ 3.55%XMR$118.70▲ 1.61%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.73▲ 5.09%LINK$11.38▲ 4.80%LEO$9.34▲ 0.37%ADA$0.1960▲ 4.81%XLM$0.1669▲ 4.37%BCH$280.30▲ 3.17%NEAR$4.01▲ 5.71%UNI$7.63▲ 7.27%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.09▲ 4.99%RAIN$0.005956▼ 8.35%CC$0.0994▲ 2.92%AVAX$8.67▲ 3.50%SUI$0.9261▲ 5.10%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.61%XAUT$4,084.47▲ 3.51%HBAR$0.0722▲ 5.13%QNT$201.95▲ 6.25%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.31%TAO$235.00▲ 5.45%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0520▲ 4.50%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

GRAMS vs Bonk

Bonk (BONK) is 558.4× the size of GRAMS (GRAMS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.23 across 31 shared trading days). GRAMS has been the more volatile of the two, at 522% annualised against BONK's 100%.

Correlation
0.23
Size ratio
1 : 558.4
GRAMSGRAMS

$0.000478

24h
+3.59%
Market cap
$477,606
Volume 24h
$4,042
Volatility (ann.)
522%
BonkBONK

$3.030e-6

24h
+6.22%
Market cap
$266.69M
Volume 24h
$38.24M
Volatility (ann.)
100%
GRAMS 0.2%Share of the two combined market caps99.8% BONK

Performance

GRAMSBONK

  1. 7 days-30.67%-3.80%BONK
  2. 30 days-4.27%-21.04%GRAMS
  3. 90 days—+8.96%—
  4. 1 year—-73.52%—

Correlation

0.23over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricGRAMSBONK
Max drawdown (400d)-60.9%-89.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.010.09
Best 30 days (past year)—+37.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-51.0%

Relative strength over 90 days: GRAMS outperformed BONK by 18.4% — measured on the GRAMS/BONK ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.