BTC$80,538.01▲ 3.38%ETH$2,430.78▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.00▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.31▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,301.72▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.65▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.50▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.05▲ 4.63%UNI$7.72▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.36▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9305▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,049.01▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0727▲ 3.96%QNT$203.62▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.70▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,538.01▲ 3.38%ETH$2,430.78▲ 5.71%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$720.00▲ 2.69%XRP$1.31▲ 2.24%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.31▲ 1.68%TRX$0.3201▼ 0.92%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.14%ZEC$1,301.72▲ 6.28%HYPE$83.65▼ 2.36%DOGE$0.0772▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 1.68%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.06%LINK$11.51▲ 3.17%LEO$9.35▲ 0.83%ADA$0.1980▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1679▲ 2.49%BCH$283.50▲ 2.82%NEAR$4.05▲ 4.63%UNI$7.72▲ 7.36%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%LTC$56.36▲ 2.95%RAIN$0.005961▼ 7.78%CC$0.0985▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.75▲ 2.76%SUI$0.9305▲ 2.98%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 1.24%XAUT$4,049.01▲ 3.11%HBAR$0.0727▲ 3.96%QNT$203.62▲ 4.84%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.55%TAO$235.70▲ 3.50%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0518▲ 2.54%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Shiba Predator vs Bonk

Bonk (BONK) is 307.2× the size of Shiba Predator (QOM) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.19 across 34 shared trading days). BONK has been the more volatile of the two, at 100% annualised against QOM's 35%.

Correlation
0.19
Size ratio
1 : 307.2
Shiba PredatorQOM

$1.456e-9

24h
-0.31%
Market cap
$873,384
Volume 24h
$254
Volatility (ann.)
35%
BonkBONK

$3.050e-6

24h
+6.45%
Market cap
$268.28M
Volume 24h
$39.25M
Volatility (ann.)
100%
QOM 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% BONK

Performance

QOMBONK

  1. 7 days-3.32%-5.86%QOM
  2. 30 days-15.19%-26.28%QOM
  3. 90 days—+3.21%—
  4. 1 year—-75.82%—

Correlation

0.19over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricQOMBONK
Max drawdown (400d)-17.2%-89.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.440.03
Best 30 days (past year)—+37.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-51.0%

Relative strength over 90 days: QOM outperformed BONK by 10.5% — measured on the QOM/BONK ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.