zmr (ZMR) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, ZMR is ahead by 30.0 percentage points (ZMR -69.8% against BORDR -99.8%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.36 across 21 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 907% annualised against ZMR's 129%.
ZMRBORDR
0.36over 21 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | ZMR | BORDR |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -69.8% | -99.8% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.54 | -0.11 |
Relative strength over 90 days: ZMR outperformed BORDR by 2340.8% — measured on the ZMR/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.